4.7 Article

Hypoxia Inhibits Subretinal Inflammation Resolution Thrombospondin-1 Dependently

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23020681

关键词

age-related macular degeneration; hypoxia; macrophages; mononuclear phagocytes; choroidal neovascularization; thrombospondin 1

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hypoxia is an essential trigger for wet age-related macular degeneration (wetAMD), promoting subretinal inflammation and inhibiting inflammation resolution. Thrombospondin 1 plays a key role in this process, and hypoxia suppresses its expression. Recombinant Thrombospondin 1 protein can counteract the pathogenic effect of hypoxia and be used as a therapeutic intervention.
Hypoxia is potentially one of the essential triggers in the pathogenesis of wet age-related macular degeneration (wetAMD), characterized by choroidal neovascularization (CNV) which is driven by the accumulation of subretinal mononuclear phagocytes (MP) that include monocyte-derived cells. Here we show that systemic hypoxia (10% O-2) increased subretinal MP infiltration and inhibited inflammation resolution after laser-induced subretinal injury in vivo. Accordingly, hypoxic (2% O-2) human monocytes (Mo) resisted elimination by RPE cells in co-culture. In Mos from hypoxic mice, Thrombospondin 1 mRNA (Thbs1) was most downregulated compared to normoxic animals and hypoxia repressed Thbs-1 expression in human monocytes in vitro. Hypoxic ambient air inhibited MP clearance during the resolution phase of laser-injury in wildtype animals, but had no effect on the exaggerated subretinal MP infiltration observed in normoxic Thbs1(-/-)-mice. Recombinant Thrombospondin 1 protein (TSP-1) completely reversed the pathogenic effect of hypoxia in Thbs1(-/-)-mice, and accelerated inflammation resolution and inhibited CNV in wildtype mice. Together, our results demonstrate that systemic hypoxia disturbs TSP-1-dependent subretinal immune suppression and promotes pathogenic subretinal inflammation and can be therapeutically countered by local recombinant TSP-1.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据