4.7 Review

The Role of Nucleocytoplasmic Transport Defects in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222212175

关键词

neurodegeneration; motor neuron; ALS

资金

  1. VIB
  2. KU Leuven
  3. Fund for Scientific Research Flanders (FWO-Vlaanderen)
  4. Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT)
  5. Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (SBO-iPSCAF)
  6. Thierry Latran Foundation
  7. Muscular Dys-trophy Association (MDA)
  8. ALS Association (ALSA)
  9. Association Francaise contre les Myopathies (AFM)
  10. Association Belge contre les Maladies neuro-Musculaires (ABMM)
  11. Target ALS
  12. ALS Liga Belgie
  13. FWO-Vlaanderen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

There is evidence suggesting that nucleocytoplasmic-transport deficits may be important in the pathogenesis of ALS, but current data are limited in clarifying the exact causal and temporal role. Understanding this will be significant for therapeutically targeting nucleocytoplasmic transport and associated proteins.
There is ample evidence that nucleocytoplasmic-transport deficits could play an important role in the pathology of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). However, the currently available data are often circumstantial and do not fully clarify the exact causal and temporal role of nucleocytoplasmic transport deficits in ALS patients. Gaining this knowledge will be of great significance in order to be able to target therapeutically nucleocytoplasmic transport and/or the proteins involved in this process. The availability of good model systems to study the nucleocytoplasmic transport process in detail will be especially crucial in investigating the effect of different mutations, as well as of other forms of stress. In this review, we discuss the evidence for the involvement of nucleocytoplasmic transport defects in ALS and the methods used to obtain these data. In addition, we provide an overview of the therapeutic strategies which could potentially counteract these defects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据