4.7 Review

B Cell Involvement in the Pathogenesis of Ankylosing Spondylitis

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms222413325

关键词

B cells; B cell subsets; antibodies; autoantibodies; B cell infiltration; ankylosing spondylitis; axial spondyloarthritis

资金

  1. Abbvie
  2. Pfizer
  3. Union Chimique Belge (UCB)
  4. Novartis
  5. BMS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research suggests that genetics, immune reactions, and the joint-gut axis play major roles in the etiology of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). While B cells have been traditionally understudied in AS pathogenesis, increasing evidence points to their involvement, with disturbances in B cell populations and the formation of antibodies seen in AS patients.
Extensive research into ankylosing spondylitis (AS) has suggested the major role of genetics, immune reactions, and the joint-gut axis in its etiology, although an ultimate consensus does not yet exist. The available evidence indicates that both autoinflammation and T-cell-mediated autoimmune processes are actively involved in the disease process of AS. So far, B cells have received relatively little attention in AS pathogenesis; this is largely due to a lack of conventional disease-defining autoantibodies. However, against prevailing dogma, there is a growing body of evidence suggestive of B cell involvement. This is illustrated by disturbances in circulating B cell populations and the formation of auto-reactive and non-autoreactive antibodies, along with B cell infiltrates within the axial skeleton of AS patients. Furthermore, the depletion of B cells, using rituximab, displayed beneficial results in a subgroup of patients with AS. This review provides an overview of our current knowledge of B cells in AS, and discusses their potential role in its pathogenesis. An overarching picture portrays increased B cell activation in AS, although it is unclear whether B cells directly affect pathogenesis, or are merely bystanders in the disease process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据