4.5 Article

Numerical analysis of steady and transient magnetohydrodynamic flows around a cylinder

期刊

出版社

WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBL CO PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1142/S0129183122501121

关键词

MHD flow; instability analysis; Hartmann number; drag and lift forces; Strouhal number

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the two-dimensional incompressible steady and time-dependent magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flows around a cylinder were simulated using a finite volume method. The results showed that the magnetic field can suppress flow instability, and increasing the Hartmann number leads to a decrease in the separation angle.
In this study, two-dimensional incompressible steady and time-dependent magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) flows around a cylinder were simulated by applying a finite volume method. The method was first validated through fair agreement of its results with the analytical solution for MHD flows inside the channels. It was then applied to simulate the MHD flows around a cylinder at Reynolds (Re) numbers varying from 100 to 1000 and Hartmann (Ha) numbers varying from 10 to 100. According to the results, although the increase in Re number strengthens the flow instability, the magnetic field suppresses this effect. The evidence for this claim is that the increase in Ha number leads to reduce in the separation angle for each Re number. This was in such a way that no flow separation was observed at Ha number equal to 50 and above for any considered Re number. Instability and therefore unsteady flows were seen only for the cases where Ha number was equal to 10 (the minimum considered value) and Re number was 500 or above. The drag coefficient (as a constant value for steady flows) or its average value (for unsteady flows) was enhanced by increasing the Ha number. The amplitude of the drag and lift coefficient fluctuations for unsteady cases were grown up by increasing the Re number. The Strouhal number was also found as a parameter that is dependent on both Re and Ha numbers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据