4.6 Article

Effect of graphene addition on the physicomechanical and tribological properties of Cu nanocomposites

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12613-020-2183-0

关键词

copper; graphene nanosheets; coating; mechanical properties; wear

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah [455-135-1440]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the mechanical and tribological properties of Cu-graphene nanosheets (GN) nanocomposites and presents a method to avoid reaction between Cu and C. Results show that the addition of GNs significantly improves the properties of Cu nanocomposites, but careful consideration should be given to the amount of GNs added. The optimum GN content is determined to be 0.5vol%, leading to improved hardness, wear rate, and coefficient of friction.
This paper presents an experimental investigation of the mechanical and tribological properties of Cu-graphene nanosheets (GN) nanocomposites. We employed the electroless coating process to coat GNs with Ag particles to avoid its reaction with Cu and the formation of intermetallic phases. We analyzed the effect of GN content on the structural, mechanical, and tribological properties of the produced nanocomposites. Results showed that the electroless coating process is an efficient technique to avoid the reaction between Cu and C and the formation of intermetallic phases. The addition of GNs significantly improves the mechanical and tribological properties of Cu nanocomposites. However, the addition of GNs needs to be done carefully because, after a certain threshold value, the mechanical and tribological properties are negatively affected. The optimum GN content is determined to be 0.5vol%, at which hardness, wear rate, and coefficient of friction are improved by 13%, 81.9%, and 49.8%, respectively, compared with Cu nanocomposites. These improved properties are due to the reduced crystallite size, presence of GNs, and homogenous distribution of the composite constituents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据