4.7 Article

Interferon gamma release assays for detection of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis in older Hispanic people

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.08.014

关键词

diagnosis; older people; IGRA; Latent TB infection; Mycobacterium tuberculosis

资金

  1. National Institute On Aging of the National Institutes of Health [P01AG051428 [P01-AG051428]]
  2. NIH/NIA NRSA [T32-AG021890]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

IGRAs are suitable for LTBI detection in older people, with more prevalent discordant and inconclusive results in this group, but these can be resolved by repeating the IGRA with a different test.
Background: Interferon gamma release assays (IGRAs) are used to detect latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) infection (LTBI) in adults, but their performance in older people is not well-established. We evaluated IGRAs for LTBI detection in older Hispanic recent TB contacts (ReC) or community controls (CoC). Methods: Cross-sectional assessment of LTBI with T-SPOT.TB and/or QuantiFERON-Gold in-tube or -Plus assay in older (>= 60 years) and adult (18-50 years) Hispanic people. Results: We enrolled 193 CoC (119 adults, 74 older persons) and 459 ReC (361 adults, 98 older persons). LTBI positivity increased with age in CoC (19%-59%, P<0.001), but was similar in ReC (59%-69%, P=0.329). Older people had lower concordance between IGRAs (kappa 0.465 vs 0.688 in adults) and more inconclusive results (indeterminate/borderline 11.6% vs 5.8% in adults, P=0.012). With simultaneous IGRAs, inconclusive results were resolved as positive or negative with the other IGRA. The magnitude of response to M.tb peptides in IGRAs was similar among age groups, but responsiveness to mitogens was lower in older people. Conclusions: IGRAs are suitable for LTBI detection in older people. Discordant and inconclusive findings are more prevalent in older people, but results are resolved when IGRA is repeated with a different IGRA test. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据