4.7 Article

Evaluation of recombinase-based isothermal amplification assays for point-of-need detection of SARS-CoV-2 in resource-limited settings

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES
卷 114, 期 -, 页码 105-111

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.11.007

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; RT-RPA; RT-RAA; Recombinase; Diagnosis; Point-of-need

资金

  1. Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency (Sida) , Sweden [GR-01455]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The democratization of diagnostics is crucial for containing the transmission of COVID-19. This study evaluated two recombinase-based isothermal techniques, RT-RPA and RT-RAA, for detecting SARS-CoV-2. The results showed that both methods have high diagnostic accuracy and can be used for timely detection of the pathogen, understanding its epidemiology, case management, and transmission control.
Objectives: The democratization of diagnostics is one of the key challenges towards containing the transmission of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) around the globe. The operational complexities of existing PCR-based methods, including sample transfer to advanced central laboratories with expensive equipment, limit their use in resource-limited settings. However, with the advent of isothermal technologies, the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is possible at decentralized facilities. Methods: In this study, two recombinase-based isothermal techniques, reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification (RT-RPA) and reverse transcription recombinase-aided amplification (RT-RAA), were evaluated for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. A total of 76 real-time reverse transcription PCR (real-time RT-PCR) confirmed COVID-19 cases and 100 negative controls were evaluated to determine the diagnostic performance of the isothermal methods. Results: This investigation revealed equally promising diagnostic accuracy of the two methods, with a sensitivity of 76.32% (95% confidence interval 65.18-85.32%) when the target genes were RdRP and ORF1ab for RT-RPA and RT-RAA, respectively; the combination of N and RdRP in RT-RPA augmented the accuracy of the assay at a sensitivity of 85.53% (95% confidence interval 75.58-92.55%). Furthermore, high specificity was observed for each of the methods, ranging from 94.00% to 98.00% (95% confidence interval 87.40-9.76%). Conclusions: Considering the diagnostic accuracies, both RT-RPA and RT-RAA appear to be suitable assays for point-of-need deployment for the detection of the pathogen, understanding its epidemiology, case management, and curbing transmission. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of International Society for Infectious Diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据