4.7 Article

Copper-based catalysts for ethanol dehydrogenation and dehydrogenative coupling into hydrogen, acetaldehyde and ethyl acetate

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 47, 期 100, 页码 42234-42249

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.253

关键词

Hydrogen; Ethanol conversion; Acetaldehyde; Ethyl acetate; Dehydrogenation; Dehydrogenative coupling

资金

  1. Vietnam National Foundation for Science and Technology Development (NAFOSTED)
  2. [104.05-2019.39]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review focuses on the development of Cu-based catalysts for ethanol dehydrogenation and dehydrogenative coupling reactions, and discusses the effects of Cu charge, particle size and dispersion, support, promoters and reaction conditions on the catalytic activity and selectivity.
Hydrogen is clean energy for the future and bio-hydrogen can be produced from bio-ethanol by dehydrogenation, and subsequent dehydrogenative coupling reactions. Two main products, acetaldehyde, and ethyl acetate, along with hydrogen are important in-dustrial products from ethanol. In this work, we focus on the progress on the development of Cu-based catalysts for ethanol dehydrogenation and dehydrogenative coupling reactions The review discusses the effect of Cu charge, Cu particle size and dispersion, support, promoters and reaction conditions. This work found that the rate of ethanol consumption is different from the absolute ethanol conversion. Cu loading and Cu dispersion have a strong impact on the catalytic activity and the proper value are 10% and 20-60% for Cu loading and dispersion, respectively. The selectivity to acetaldehyde and ethyl acetate can be tailored by particle size, Cu oxidation, acidity/basicity of catalyst as well as contact time. This review will provide a full picture of the development of Cu-based catalysts for ethanol dehydration and has a significant impact on the field.(c) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据