4.7 Article

Ethanol dry reforming over Ni supported on modified ceria-zirconia catalysts-the effect of Ti and Nb dopants

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 79, 页码 39236-39250

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.09.197

关键词

Ethanol; Dry reforming; Hydrogen; Syngas; Supercritical synthesis

资金

  1. Russian Science Foundation [18-73-10167]
  2. Russian Science Foundation [18-73-10167] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Complex metal-oxide catalysts with doping cations were synthesized by a solvothermal method, showing enhanced activity and stability in ethanol dry reforming reactions. The incorporation of doping cations increased oxygen deficiency, facilitating the implementation of a bifunctional reforming mechanism.
In this work complex metal-oxide catalysts with the general formula 5 wt% Ni/Ce0.75Zr0.25-x(Nb,Ti)(x)O2-delta were synthesized by the solvothermal method using supercritical alcohols followed by nickel deposition. The catalysts were characterized and studied in ethanol dry reforming reaction (EDR) in the temperature range 600-750 degrees C. XRD and TEM showed that the synthesis method provides incorporation of doping cations into the ceria-zirconia fluorite structure, leading to mixed oxides formation. The effect of doping cations on structural and surface properties of 5 wt% Ni/Ce0.75Zr0.25-x(Nb,Ti)(x)O2-delta and activity in the EDR reaction was investigated. Oxygen deficiency delta increases with the introduction of titanium and niobium cations, which contributes to the bifunctional reforming mechanism implementation with rapid oxidation of coke precursors and activation of CO2 at surface oxygen vacancies. TPO-O-2 analysis after reaction showed no carbon formation above 700 degrees C, and a few carbon deposits (not exceeding 4%) even after significant catalyst deactivation at 600 degrees C. (C) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据