4.7 Review

Zeolite and clay based catalysts for CO2 reforming of methane to syngas: A review

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 47, 期 72, 页码 30759-30787

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.12.214

关键词

Dry reforming of methane; Zeolite; Clay; Syngas; Process parameters; Optimization

资金

  1. University of Ilorin, Nigeria
  2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Transdisciplinary [06G52, 06G53]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review summarizes the recent advances in the development of coke and heat resistant catalysts for the dry reforming of methane (DRM), and discusses the emerging trends in engineered mesostructured catalysts. The review highlights the advances in catalyst synthesis procedures and characterization methods.
The development of coke and heat resistant catalyst for dry reforming of methane (DRM) is the major bottleneck towards the industrialization and commercialization of the process. Zeolite-based and clay-based catalysts are promising candidates for DRM to produce syngas (CO and H-2). The abundance, low cost, excellent properties and environmentally friendly nature of these support materials are an added advantage. Herein, this review entails the recent advances in development of zeolite and clay-based catalysts for DRM. In addition, the review captured a discussion on emerging trends in engineered mesostruc-tured DRM catalysts. Tailoring of their framework configuration, pore architecture, crystals morphology and incorporation of active phases have led to the discovery of novel, robust & nbsp; and high-performance catalysts. Notably, advances recorded in the catalysts synthesis procedures and characterization methods were also highlighted and elaborately discussed. It is expected that this review provide a comprehensive roadmap in the quest for an economically and industrially potent catalyst for syngas production via DRM. (c) 2021 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据