4.7 Article

Enhanced hydrogen permeance through graphene oxide membrane deposited on asymmetric spinel hollow fiber substrate

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 47, 期 16, 页码 9616-9626

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.049

关键词

Graphene oxide; Hollow fiber; Hydrogen; Purification

资金

  1. FAPEMIG (Fundacao de Amparoa Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais)
  2. CAPES (Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior)
  3. CNPq (Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Graphene oxide (GO) membranes are suitable for hydrogen purification. This study successfully deposited a GO layer on asymmetric spinel hollow fibers using the vacuum-assisted method, creating a composite membrane with high permeability, ideal hydrogen selectivity, and high oxidation degree.
Membranes of graphene oxide (GO) present suitable application for hydrogen (H2) purification. The deposition of a selective and high permeable GO membrane on a proper substrate is still a challenge. Here we applied the vacuum-assisted method to deposit a GO layer on asymmetric spinel (MgAl2O4) hollow fibers. The synthetized GO showed a nanosheeted morphological structure and a relative high degree of oxidation. The hollow fibers were produced with dolomite and alumina as the ceramic starting material and showed the desired asymmetric pore size distribution, in addition to suitable bending strength, 54.88 +/- 4.25 MPa, and average surface roughness, 180 +/- 8.2 nm. A continuous GO layer of 1.7 +/- 0.2 mm was deposited onto the fiber outer surface. The composite MgAl2O4/GO membrane presented H2 permeance of 8.2 +/- 0.0 x 10-7 mol s-1 m-2 Pa-1 at room temperature (approximately 25 degrees C) and 0.3 MPa of transmembrane pressure. Ideal hydrogen/ nitrogen and hydrogen/carbon dioxide selectivity values were of 3.3 +/- 0.0 and 11.4 +/- 0.1, respectively. (c) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据