4.7 Article

Hydrogen supply chain scenarios for the decarbonisation of a German multi-modal energy system

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 46, 期 76, 页码 38008-38025

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.09.041

关键词

Energy system modelling; Natural gas infrastructure; Sector coupling; Hydrogen pipeline; Hydrogen trailer

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Analyzing hydrogen supply chains is crucial for understanding future energy systems with sector coupling. A multi-modal energy system model incorporating various transportation options was set up for Germany in 2050. Sensitivity analysis of hydrogen demands was conducted to provide scenarios for future requirements of hydrogen supply and transportation infrastructure.
Analysing hydrogen supply chains is of utmost importance to adequately understand future energy systems with a high degree of sector coupling. Here, a multi-modal energy system model is set up as linear programme incorporating electricity, natural gas as well as hydrogen transportation options for Germany in 2050. Further, different hydrogen import routes and optimised inland electrolysis are included. In a sensitivity analysis, hydrogen demands are varied to cover uncertainties and to provide scenarios for future re-quirements of a hydrogen supply and transportation infrastructure. 80% of the overall hydrogen demand of 150 TWh/a emerge in Northern Germany due to optimised electro-lyser locations and imports, which subsequently need to be transported southwards. Therefore, a central hydrogen pipeline connection from Schleswig-Holstein to the region of Darmstadt evolves already for moderate demands and appears to be a no-regret investment. Furthermore, a natural gas pipeline reassignment potential of 46% is identified. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据