4.7 Article

Comparative analysis on similarities and differences of hydrogen energy development in the World's top 4 largest economies: A novel framework

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
卷 47, 期 16, 页码 9485-9503

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.038

关键词

Hydrogen energy development; IETB framework; Typical industrialized countries; Similarity and difference analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [72103128]
  2. Key Projects in Soft Science Research of Shanghai Science and Technology Commission [21692109400]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen energy, as a low-carbon energy source, plays a crucial role in energy transition, but countries face different challenges and advantages in the development of the hydrogen industry. Currently, the development of hydrogen energy in each country is still in the stage of quantitative change, and the inflection point of qualitative change has not been reached.
A low-carbon energy transition is permeating many industrialized countries due to the overuse of fossil fuels and the climate change. Some countries stress the hydrogen energy in optimizing their energy structures. This article examines both the markets and the policies of the hydrogen industry in the World's Top 4 largest economies. To make the comparative analysis more logical, a novel conceptual model for energy transition - the institution-economics-technology-behavior framework - has been adopted to make a multi-dimensional discussion. The results show that: (1) From the perspective of strategic intention, developing hydrogen energy is conductive to the energy transition. (2) From the horizontal comparison, each country has its own advantages, however, the main driving factors are different. (3) From the vertical comparison, the hydrogen energy development in each country is still in the stage of quantitative change, and the inflection point of qualitative change has not been reached yet. (c) 2022 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据