4.7 Article

A quantitative phase diagram of droplet impingement boiling

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121535

关键词

Droplet impingement; Boiling heat transfer; Quantitative phase diagram

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51806005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A quantitative phase diagram approach is proposed in this paper to determine the intensity of heat transfer during droplet impingement boiling by measuring the temperature evolution in the substrate, revealing richer information compared to traditional phase diagram method.
The traditional phase diagram of droplet impingement boiling on a heated substrate is drawn based on the boiling morphologies recorded with high-speed camera, which is useful to qualitatively determine the strength of droplet impingement heat transfer and the transition boundaries. However, the major shortcut of this method is that one cannot distinguish the heat transfer variation in the same region on phase diagram. To address this problem, this paper proposes a quantitative phase diagram which is determined with the measurements of temperature evolution in substrate. In the experiments, the two ends of a differential thermocouple are inserted in the substrate at different depth, and the recorded maximum temperature difference during the droplet impact is employed to quantify the intensity of heat transfer. Therefore, the contour of the maximum temperature difference in the space of the substrate temperature and the droplet Weber number provides a quantitative phase diagram. The comparisons of the two phase diagrams are conducted, and it shows that the new phase diagram could reveal richer information. For example, a second peak of the heat flux in the transition boiling could be observed under specific Weber numbers, which forms an island in the quantitative phase diagram. Finally, based on the captured images, the observed heat transfer characteristics were analyzed and explained. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据