4.7 Article

Experimental investigation of flow and pressure drop characteristics of air-oil slug flow in a horizontal tube

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.122063

关键词

Two-phase flow; Flow visualization; Theoretical model; Slug flow parameter

资金

  1. Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement (KAIA) - Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport [1615009756]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates two-phase flow and pressure drop characteristics associated with slug flow in a tube with an inner diameter of 4 cm. Experimental results show that a theoretical slug flow model accurately predicts the total pressure gradient of slug unit, with an overall mean absolute error of 19.3%.
This study examines two-phase flow and pressure drop characteristics associated with slug flow in a tube with an inner diameter of 4 cm. Experiments are conducted using air and low viscosity mineral oil as working fluids at atmospheric pressure and two different oil temperatures, 25 and 45 degrees C. The superficial gas and liquid velocities are in the range of 0.33-2.43 m/s and 0.20-1.20 m/s, respectively. Flow visualization images and temporal records of pressure drop oscillation are presented for different gas and liquid superficial velocities. The relevant flow parameters associated with slug flow, such as the elongated bubble velocity, elongated bubble length, liquid slug length, and liquid film thickness, are measured, and the relationship between the slug flow parameters and the superficial gas and liquid velocities is investigated. The measured pressure gradient data are also compared to predictions of previous homogeneous equilibrium models and semi-empirical correlations for two-phase frictional pressure gradient. A theoretical slug flow model for predicting the total pressure gradient of slug unit is presented using empirical correlations for the slug flow parameters. The new model accurately predicts the experimental pressure gradient data, evidenced by an overall mean absolute error of 19.3%. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据