4.7 Article

Cooling effect of droplet impacting on heated solid surface

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.122070

关键词

Droplet impact; Heat transfer; Cooling effectiveness

资金

  1. Shanghai Sailing Program [21YF1408700]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M680069]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the cooling effect and mechanisms of single droplet impacting on a heated solid surface by using two noncontact measurement techniques. Four typical impact regimes were observed and a comprehensive map based on non-dimensional analysis was built to describe the relationships among them. Empirical correlations were acquired to predict the non-dimensional maximum spreading diameter.
This paper presents the outcomes and mechanisms of single droplet impacting on a heated solid surface with changing temperature. Two noncontact measurement techniques including a Thermal Infrared Imager and a High-speed Digital Recording Camera were adopted in the experiments to explore the cooling effect of the droplet on the heated surface with varying temperatures and to record the typical phenomena, respectively. Four typical impact regimes including flattening, bubble, transition from bubble to atomization and atomization during the droplet impact were observed and a comprehensive map based on non-dimensional analysis was built to describe the relationships among the typical regimes. For quantitative analysis, the empirical correlations were acquired to predict the non-dimensional maximum spreading diameter based on non-dimensional analysis. The non-dimensional droplet resident time decreases linearly with the increase of T-w/T-sat log(10)Re. The heat flux of average droplet was calculated and the result showed that it increases with the non-dimensional parameter T-w/T-sat log(10)Re.The transient temperature of the heated surface was measured to quantify the effectiveness of cooling. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据