4.6 Article

Utility of natural and artificial geochemical tracers for leakage monitoring and quantification during an offshore controlled CO2 release experiment

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103421

关键词

Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS); Offshore storage; Geochemical tracers; CO2 leak detection; CO2 leak quantification; Source attribution

资金

  1. European Union [654462]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A unique field experiment was conducted in the central North Sea to simulate CO2 leakage from a sub-seafloor storage reservoir. Tracer analyses showed the dissolution and release rates of CO2, with the potential to confirm the source of leaking CO2 once seabed samples are retrieved. This methodology could be applied for efficient monitoring of offshore geological storage of carbon dioxide.
To inform cost-effective monitoring of offshore geological storage of carbon dioxide (CO2), a unique field experiment, designed to simulate leakage of CO2 from a sub-seafloor storage reservoir, was carried out in the central North Sea. A total of 675 kg of CO2 were released into the shallow sediments (similar to 3 m below seafloor) for 11 days at flow rates between 6 and 143 kg d(-1). A set of natural, inherent tracers (C-13, O-18) of injected CO2 and added, non-toxic tracer gases (octafluoropropane, sulfur hexafluoride, krypton, methane) were used to test their applicability for CO2 leakage attribution and quantification in the marine environment. All tracers except O-18 were capable of attributing the CO2 source. Tracer analyses indicate that CO2 dissolution in sediment pore waters ranged from 35 % at the lowest injection rate to 41% at the highest injection rate. Direct measurements of gas released from the sediment into the water column suggest that 22 % to 48 % of the injected CO2 exited the seafloor at, respectively, the lowest and the highest injection rate. The remainder of injected CO2 accumulated in gas pockets in the sediment. The methodologies can be used to rapidly confirm the source of leaking CO2 once seabed samples are retrieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据