4.6 Article

CO2-brine - sandstone wettability evaluation at reservoir conditions via Nuclear Magnetic Resonance measurements

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2021.103435

关键词

Wettability; Wettability Nuclear Magnetic Resonance; Carbone dioxide (CO2); geo-sequestration; Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS); Sandstone

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study involves wettability measurements on sandstone using NMR experiments, showing that CO2 significantly reduces the hydrophilicity of the sandstone and thereby reducing project risk.
CO2-rock wettability is a key parameter which governs CO2 trapping capacities and containment security in the context of CO2 geo-sequestration schemes. However, significant uncertainties still exist in terms of predicting CO2 rock wettability at true reservoir conditions. This study thus reports on wettability measurements via independent Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) experiments on sandstone (CO2-brine systems) to quantify Wettability Indices (WI) using the United States Bureau of Mines (USBM) scale. The results show that CO2 (either molecularly dissolved or as a separate supercritical phase) significantly reduced the hydrophilicity of the sandstone from strongly water-wet (WI approximate to 1) to weakly water-wet (WI = 0.26), and associated with that the water-wetness of the rock for the two-phase systems. This was caused by additional protonation of surface silanol groups on the quartz, induced by carbonic acid. Capillary pressure and relative permeability curves and residual CO2 saturation were also measured; these results were compared with literature data, and general consistency was found. NMR T2 distribution measurements also demonstrated preferential water displacement in large pores (r 1 mu m) following scCO2 flooding, while no change was observed for smaller pores (r < 1 mu m). These insights add confidence to the assessments of CO2-rock wettability and therefore reduce project risk. This work thus aids in the implementation of large-scale CO2 sequestration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据