4.5 Article

In-house validation and application of UHPLC-MS/MS method for the quantification of pyrrolizidine and tropane alkaloids in commercial honey bee-collected pollen, teas and herbal infusions purchased on Italian market in 2019-2020 referring to recent European Union regulations

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.15567

关键词

Consumer; health; herbal infusion; pollen; pyrrolizidine alkaloids; regulation; tea bag; tropane alkaloids; UHPLC-MS; MS; validation

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [RC IZSVE 11/17]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two analytical methods for quantification of PAs and TAs in honey bee-collected pollen, teas, and herbal infusions were developed and validated. The methods showed good linearity, accuracy, and robustness. The results of a preliminary investigation revealed that about half of the pollen samples contained PAs below the maximum limit, while two samples were contaminated with TAs. One-third of teas or herbal infusions contained PAs or TAs, with one sample exceeding the EU limits for both PAs and TAs.
Two analytical methods for the quantification of pyrrolizidine (PAs) and tropane alkaloids (TAs) in honey bee-collected pollen, teas and herbal infusions have been in-house validated using the UHPLC-MS/MS technique. These methods showed good linearity, good accuracy and robustness. The methods have been applied to a preliminary investigation of forty-seven pollen samples and thirty-three packs of tea-bags in light of Commission Regulations (EU) 2020/2040 and 2021/1408 regarding maximum limits of PAs and TAs in foodstuffs, respectively. About half of the pollen samples contained searched PAs but in concentrations significantly lower than the maximum limit established; two samples were contaminated with TAs. One third of teas or herbal infusions contained PAs or TAs, one sample exceeded the EU limits for PAs and one for TAs. Despite the final consumer's health does not seem threatened, these results recommend accurate analytical methods and broader investigations for PAs and TAs in foods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据