4.5 Article

Interaction of mulberry anthocyanins with soybean protein isolate: effect on the stability of anthocyanins and protein in vitro digestion characteristics

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.15576

关键词

Mulberry anthocyanins; non-covalent interaction; protein digestibility; soybean protein isolate; thermal stability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21978169]
  2. Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province [2018B020239001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the interaction mechanism between soybean protein isolate (SPI) and mulberry anthocyanins (MA) and found that it affects the thermal stability of anthocyanins and the digestibility of protein subunits.
The interactions of anthocyanins and proteins might mutually influence each other on the physicochemical and functional properties. In this study, the interaction mechanism of soybean protein isolate (SPI) with mulberry anthocyanins (MA), and its effect on the thermal stability of anthocyanins and protein subunits' digestibility were investigated through multiple spectroscopies and in vitro gastrointestinal models. Results showed that cyanidin-3-O-glucoside (C3G), the main anthocyanin monomer in MA, could bind to SPI through hydrophobic interactions, resulting in static fluorescence quenching of SPI. The secondary structure of SPI changed by binding to C3G, with an increase of beta-sheet and a decrease of alpha-helix and random coil. The formation of the SPI-MA complexes improved the thermal stability of MA at 353 K, while, no significant protection occurred during heating at 368 K. Complexation with MA promoted the digestibility of SPI by pepsin, especially the alpha ' and alpha subunits of beta-conglycinin and the basic subunit of glycinin, and slightly delayed the digestibility of SPI under intestinal fluid. These results provide an in-depth understanding of the influence of the protein-anthocyanin interactions on the stability of anthocyanins and protein digestibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据