4.5 Article

Inhibition of phenolics on the in vitro digestion of noodles from the view of phenolics release

期刊

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ijfs.15502

关键词

Enzyme inhibition; in vitro digestion; molecular docking; phenolic release; starch

资金

  1. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Programme, CAAS
  2. Modern Agricultural Industry Technology System [CARS-03]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The inhibitory mechanism of buckwheat phenolics on starch digestion was studied in extruded noodles, showing a dose-effect relationship between reducing sugar released and the release of phenolics. Phenolics bind with alpha-amylase through hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interaction, inhibiting its activity and reducing starch digestion. The release of phenolics during cooking and digestion explains the reduction in starch digestion.
The inhibition mechanism of buckwheat phenolics on in vitro starch digestion was investigated using extruded noodles with buckwheat starch and phenolic extract (0.50%-2.00%). The cooking quality and reducing sugar released during in vitro digestion were studied, and the extractable phenolic content along digestion was also monitored to reveal a dose-effect relationship between reducing sugar released and the release of phenolics. Noodles containing increased phenolics released less reducing sugar (230-188 mg g(-1)) during digestion. Cooking and digestion made phenolics more extractable, and most of the phenolics were released at the end of the gastric phase (85.6%-94.8%) compared with during the small intestinal digestion. The IC50 of buckwheat phenolic extract (0.102 mg mL(-1)) was four times that of acarbose (0.032 mg mL(-1)). The inhibitory mechanism was further analysed using molecular docking, in which the activity of alpha-amylase was inhibited by phenolics that bind with active sites of alpha-amylase through hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interaction. Phenolics interacting with starch and the released phenolics can both explain the reduction in starch digestion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据