4.5 Article

Soil salinity mitigation by naturally grown halophytes in seawater affected coastal Bangladesh

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-022-03912-7

关键词

Accumulation; Halophyte; Halophytodesalination; Salinity; Soil

资金

  1. International Foundation for Science (IFS), Sweden [C/5867-1]
  2. GARE, Ministry of Education, Government of Bangladesh [LS2019899]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, phytodesalination of saline soils using selected hyperaccumulating halophytes was evaluated in coastal Bangladesh. The findings showed that Sesuvium edmonstonei and Enhydra fluctuans have high phytodesalination capacity and are good accumulators of sodium ions (Na+).
Phytodesalination of saline soils using selected hyperaccumulating halophytes were evaluated in coastal Bangladesh. Four hyperaccumulating halophytes species-Thankuni (Centella asiatica), Holud nakful (Eclipta alba), Helencha (Enhydra fluctuans) and Lona pata (Sesuvium edmonstonei)-were selected from 35 species grown in different saline regions of Bangladesh. Then, each of the four selected halophytes was grown in 4.36, 4.85, 5.77 and 6.57 deciSiemens/meter (dS m(-1)) saline soil for four months. All plants were separated into root and shoot after harvesting. Electrical conductivity was significantly decreased in phytodesalinated soil compared to the not-cultivated soils. The maximum phytodesalination capacity (251.22 kg Na+ ha(-1)) and the highest sodium adsorption ratio (48%) were observed in S. edmonstonei cultivated soil. Translocation factor and bio-concentration factor values indicated that sodium ion (Na+) were readily transported from soil to root to shoot, and all four halophytes were good Na+ accumulator. Distinct anatomical variations were found in microscopic image of root, stem and leaf cells indicating vacuolar and vascular bundle sequestration responsible for Na+ hyperaccumulation. S. edmonstonei and E. fluctuans have high potentiality for the use of halophytodesalination of saline soils.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据