4.5 Article

Performance evaluation of integrated anaerobic and aerobic reactors for treatment of real textile wastewater

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-021-03830-0

关键词

Feeding and non-feeding cycle; Hybrid treatment; Organic loading rate; Organic removal; Semi-continuous mode

资金

  1. MS Research Grant by National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a hybrid anaerobic-aerobic treatment method for real textile wastewater was investigated. The lab-scale experiment utilized an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor coupled with a sequencing batch reactor (SBR). The results showed that the integrated system had high removal efficiencies for various pollutants in the textile wastewater and demonstrated robustness and flexibility.
A hybrid anaerobic-aerobic treatability of real textile wastewater was investigated by using a lab-scale upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) coupled with a sequencing batch reactor (SBR). The performance of the integrated system was determined under various operational conditions. In phase I of the study, the UASB reactor was operated and optimized on real textile wastewater. The UASB was operated at a hydraulic retention time of 48 h in a semi-continuous mode with 12-h feeding and 12-h non-feeding cycle. Volatile fatty acid to alkalinity ratio was kept in the range of 0.42-0.72, while pH was strictly maintained between 6.8 and 7.2 under mesophilic conditions (35 degrees C). In phase II of the study, SBR was coupled with a UASB reactor and operated on real textile wastewater. The SBR was operated at an HRT of 6 h and solids retention time of 20 days. The integrated system was optimized with maximum removal efficiencies of 98% for chemical oxygen demand, 94% for color, 93% for total Kjeldahl nitrogen, and 89% for orthophosphate phosphorus. The results indicated that the integrated system is robust and flexible for the treatment of textile wastewater.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据