4.7 Article

Understanding the role of lithium bonds in doped graphene nanoribbons as cathode hosts for Li-S batteries: A first-principles study

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 4, 页码 4405-4416

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/er.7438

关键词

cathode hosts; DFT; graphene; lithium bond; lithium-sulfur batteries; shuttle effect

资金

  1. Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, Government of India [31/03/2014-15/PVSE-RD]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that hydrogen bond-like Li bonds and dipole-dipole interactions play key roles in anchoring polysulfides, highlighting the importance of the directionality of lone pairs for proper adsorption of LiPS. The value of ELF can provide a quick estimate of bond strength.
Using first-principles calculations, we investigate a family of doped graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) for their suitability as cathode hosts in lithium-sulfur batteries. We probe the role played by the lone pairs of the dopants in confining the lithium polysulfides (LiPS) to understand the mechanism of binding. Our results show that the Li bond between the polysulfides and the doped GNRs is analogous to a hydrogen bond and also dipole-dipole interactions play a key role in anchoring the polysulfides. A critical donor-Li-acceptor angle of 180 degrees is found to be essential for proper adsorption of LiPS, highlighting the importance of the directionality of lone pairs. The charge lost by the sulfur atom of the polysulfide upon adsorption and shape of the lone pair basins and the value of Electron Localization Function (ELF) at the dopant position can provide a quick estimate of the strength of the bond. Significant contractions in the ELF profiles are also observed upon Li2S adsorption, further providing evidence for the hydrogen bond-like nature of the Li bond. Our results corroborate the fact that all acceptors capable of forming hydrogen bonds can be employed as suitable dopants for carbon-based cathode hosts in Li-S batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据