4.7 Article

Improvement of structural stability of cathode by manganese additive in electrolyte for zinc-ion batteries

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH
卷 46, 期 6, 页码 8464-8470

出版社

WILEY-HINDAWI
DOI: 10.1002/er.7687

关键词

cathode; electrolyte; electrolyte additive; rate performance; zinc-ion battery

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF2020R1C1C1010611]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) are a potential alternative to lithium-ion batteries due to their low cost, eco-friendly nature, and high safety level. However, ZIBs suffer from low-rate capability and poor cycling life caused by the dissolution of manganese in the electrolyte. This study introduces a manganese sulfate additive to overcome these issues and improve the electrochemical performance of manganese-based cathodes.
Zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs) are considered a candidate for lithium-ion batteries owing to their low cost, eco-friendly nature, and high safety level. In particular, their energy density is high because of a two-electron transfer mechanism involving Zn ions. However, ZIBs have the demerits of low-rate capability and poor cycling life because of the dissolution of Mn in the electrolyte during charging and discharging, which prevents the high potential of ZIBs from being effectively utilized. In this study, a manganese sulfate (MnSO4) additive was introduced in the electrolyte to overcome these drawbacks. A ZIB with such an electrolyte exhibited stable capacity behavior and high cycling stability. Furthermore, the fabricated ZIBs showed a specific capacity of 289 mAh g(-1) at a current density of 0.3 A g(-1), improved rate-performance of 116 mAh g(-1) at a current density of 2.0 A g(-1), and excellent long-term stability of 72% for 200 cycles at a current density of 1.0 A g(-1). These findings indicate that the use of the aforementioned additive is a promising for enhancing the electrochemical performance of manganese-based cathodes in electrolyte-optimized next-generation ZIBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据