4.6 Article

Optimal operation strategies of multi-energy systems integrated with liquid air energy storage using information gap decision theory

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2021.107078

关键词

Multi-energy systems (MES); Liquid air energy storage (LAES); Information gap decision theory (IGDT); Demand response; Uncertainties

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61973322]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposed a framework integrating Multi-energy system (MES) with Liquid Air Energy Storage (LAES) system, which is a powerful and eco-friendly technology for storing renewable energy. Electricity prices will affect the overall cost of MES, and decision-makers need to consider the uncertainty of electricity prices. Three power dispatching strategies were proposed using the information gap decision theory method, and demand response algorithms were used to study load transfer strategies, showing effective load transfer and cost savings.
In this paper, a framework of multi-energy system (MES) integrating with a liquid air energy storage (LAES) system was proposed. LAES, where liquid air works as an energy storage media, is a powerful and eco-friendly technology for storing renewable energy resources and reducing grid curtailment. Considering the characteristics of LAES (i.e. cold and heat circulation), the incorporation of LAES system into the Combined Cooling, Heating and Power system can achieve integrated use of energy and effectively save energy. Moreover, the prices of electricity will affect the overall cost of the MES. In other words, the decision-makers of the MES need to consider the uncertainty of electricity prices when making power dispatching decisions. To model the uncertainty of electricity prices, the information gap decision theory method was used to study power dispatching strategies of the MES. Three different strategies were proposed, including risk-neutral, risk-averse and risk-taker. In addition, demand response algorithms were used to study load transfer strategies. The results show that the demand responses of the three strategies are effective in terms of load transfer and cost saving. The total operation cost in the risk-neutral strategy with demand response can be 6.82% less than that without demand response; In the risktaker strategy with demand response, the allowable grid electricity price is reduced by 25.24% when the opportunity cost drops by $8,000, and 23.32% without demand response. With additional robustness cost, the acceptable price change ratio using demand response is 21.91% in the risk-averse strategy, and 20.04% without demand response.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据