4.6 Article

Bilinear damage evolution in AA2011 wire drawing processes

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DAMAGE MECHANICS
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 645-664

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/10567895211072581

关键词

Damage; ductile fracture; wire drawing; continuum damage mechanics; Lemaitre's model

资金

  1. National Agency of Research and Development ANID through FONDECYT Project [1180591]
  2. National Agency of Research and Development ANID through scholarship program Beca Doctorado Nacional 2019 [21190205]
  3. DICYT-VRIDEI-USACH [DICYT 052016C_AYUDANTE]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents an experimental and numerical analysis of damage evolution in AA2011 aluminum alloy wires drawn under different scenarios. The experimental results show a bilinear damage relationship in terms of the effective plastic strain. A modification of the classical Lemaitre model is proposed to reproduce bilinear paths of damage, and its predictive capability is assessed in numerical simulations, which demonstrate good agreement with the corresponding experimental data.
This paper presents an experimental and numerical analysis of damage evolution in AA2011 aluminum alloy wires drawn under different scenarios. To this end, load-unload tensile tests were firstly carried out in order to characterize the degradation of the mechanical response in every cycle where the experimental results show a bilinear damage relationship in terms of the effective plastic strain. Therefore, a modification of the classical Lemaitre model is proposed in this work in order to reproduce bilinear paths of damage with the addition of only two parameters that can be directly obtained from the material characterization. Then, the damage predictive capability of this new experimental-based model is assessed in numerical simulations of the drawing process in one and two passes (considering for this last case the sequential and tandem configurations) where the computed predictions are compared with the corresponding experimental data showing a good agreement between them.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据