4.7 Review

Underlying the Mechanisms of Doxorubicin-Induced Acute Cardiotoxicity: Oxidative Stress and Cell Death

期刊

出版社

IVYSPRING INT PUBL
DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.65258

关键词

Doxorubicin; cardiotoxicity; oxidative stress; cell death

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFC1311300]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2042018kf1032]
  3. Development Centre for Medical Science and Technology National Health and Family Planning Commission of the People's Republic of China (The prevention and control project of cardiovascular disease) [2016ZX-008-01]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81870299]
  5. Guiding Fund of Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University [RMYD2018M39]
  6. Science and Technology Planning Projects of Wuhan [2018061005132295]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review provides a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms underlying the oxidative stress and cell death pathways induced by doxorubicin, which are the major factors responsible for the acute cardiotoxicity. The authors aim to offer new insights for researchers to discover potential therapeutic strategies to prevent or reverse doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.
Cancer is a destructive disease that causes high levels of morbidity and mortality. Doxorubicin (DOX) is a highly efficient antineoplastic chemotherapeutic drug, but its use places survivors at risk for cardiotoxicity. Many studies have demonstrated that multiple factors are involved in DOX-induced acute cardiotoxicity. Among them, oxidative stress and cell death predominate. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the mechanisms underlying the source and effect of free radicals and dependent cell death pathways induced by DOX. Hence, we attempt to explain the cellular mechanisms of oxidative stress and cell death that elicit acute cardiotoxicity and provide new insights for researchers to discover potential therapeutic strategies to prevent or reverse doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据