4.7 Article

Enhancing the detection sensitivity of nanobody against aflatoxin B1 through structure-guided modification

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.11.182

关键词

Nanobody; Aflatoxin B-1; Structure-guided modification

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0704000, 2016YFA0501201]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21705161, 21735007, 22074152, 21921004, 21991080]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully improved the binding activity of Nb28 against AFB(1) by analyzing the structure of nanobody Nb26 and its recognition mechanism, resulting in enhanced detection sensitivity.
Nanobodies (Nbs) have shown great potential in immunodetection of small-molecule contaminants in food and environmental monitoring. However, the limited knowledge of the mechanism of Nbs binding to small molecules has hampered the development of high-affinity Nbs and assay improvement. We previously reported two homologous nanobodies Nb26 and Nb28 specific to aflatoxin B-1 (AFB(1)), with the former exhibiting higher sensitivity in ELISA. Herein, Nb26 was selected as the model antibody to resolve its solution nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) structure, and investigate its AFB(1) recognition mechanism. The results revealed that Nb26 exhibits a typical immunoglobulin fold and its AFB(1)-binding interface is uniquely located in complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) and framework region 2 (FR2). This finding was applied to improve the binding activity of Nb28 against AFB(1) by constructing two Nb28-based mutants A(50)V and (SD)-D-102, resulting in 2.3- and 3.3-fold sensitivity enhancement over the wild type, respectively. This study develops an NMR-based strategy to analyze the underlying mechanism of Nb against AFB(1), and successfully generated two site-modified Nbs with improved detection sensitivity. It is believed that this work could greatly expand the applications of Nbs by providing a way to enhance the binding activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据