4.7 Article

Fluoxetine and sertraline based multitarget inhibitors of cholinesterases and monoamine oxidase-A/B for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: Synthesis, pharmacology and molecular modeling studies

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.10.102

关键词

Acetylcholinesterase; Butyrylcholinesterase; Monoamine oxidase A; B; Fluoxetine; Sertraline

资金

  1. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) at King Abdulaziz Uni-versity, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia [KEP-7-130-42]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study focuses on synthesizing multi-target compounds that can inhibit both cholinesterases and monoamine oxidase. A series of fluoxetine and sertraline hybrids showed excellent inhibition activity, with compounds 17 and 22 potentially blocking neurodegenerative effects in mice.
For the potential therapy of Alzheimer's disease (AD), cholinesterases (ChE) and monoamine oxidase (MAO) are key enzymes that regulate the level of acetylcholinesterase (AChE)/butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) and monoamines. The aim of current research is the synthesis of multi-target compounds that can concomitantly inhibit ChEs and MAO. A series of fluoxetine and sertraline hybrids was designed and evaluated as multi-target inhibitors of ChEs and hMAO. In-vitro enzyme inhibition studies demonstrated that a number of compounds displayed excellent inhibition in submicromolar to nanomolar range. However, compounds 17, 22, 38-40 possess excellent concomitant inhibitory activity against ChEs and hMAO-A/B enzymes and thus emerged as optimal multi-target hybrids. In-vivo acute toxicity study showed the safety of synthesized compounds up to 2000 mg/kg dose. The examinations of brain tissue in Swiss albino mice suggested that selected most active MAO-B inhibitors 17 and 22 have a propensity to block the MAO-B activity that could be responsible for their neurodegenerative effect in mice. The in-vitro inhibitory manner of interaction of these multipotent compounds on all four targets were confirmed by molecular docking investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据