4.7 Article

Controlled release antimicrobial sachet prepared from poly(butylene succinate)/geraniol and ethylene vinyl alcohol coated paper for bread shelf-life extension application

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.08.119

关键词

Biopolymers and biocomposites; Essential oil; Antimicrobial packaging

资金

  1. National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) [NRCT5-RSA63020-01]
  2. Srinakharinwirot University [053/2564]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study successfully developed an antimicrobial sachet for extending the shelf-life of white bread, describing its structure and performance in detail. Experimental results showed that the antimicrobial sachet can effectively inhibit spoilage and delay the decay of bread.
This research aims to develop white bread shelf-life extension sachet with controlled release of antimicrobial agent prepared from multicomponent bio-based materials. The structure of antimicrobial sachet consists of two major parts i.e., controlled release part and active part. The first part produced from paper coated with ethylene vinyl alcohol (EVOH). The second one was an active part which produced from biodegradable poly(butylene succinate) (PBS) and geraniol essential oil blend. Inhibition clear zone test results showed that a suitable geraniol concentration, encapsulated in PBS, was 10 wt%. Based on the water vapor transmission test, coating paper with EVOH for three times (around 450 mu m) was an optimal condition for the use as a controlled release part. Release test indicated that geraniol migration concentration increased with increasing the relative humidity (RH) in the package which correlated to the moisture liberated from bread slice. Shelf-life extension study informed that the spoilage of bread stored with antimicrobial sachet was delayed by more than three weeks. In summary, this antimicrobial sachet could be used in food shelf-life extension purpose which easily placed in any food container. This is an alternative way of food waste minimization.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据