4.7 Article

Satellite Earth observation to support sustainable rural development

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102466

关键词

Satellite Earth observation; Rural development; Socioeconomic; Poverty; Livelihoods; Sustainable Development Goals

资金

  1. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) Doctorate Training Program at the University of Edinburgh (E3DTP) [NE/L002558/1]
  2. CASE Industrial Funding from the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg Austria [R84040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review highlights the inadequacy of traditional data in measuring poverty and achieving sustainable development goals, proposing satellite earth observation data as a potential supplement for sustainable rural development. The research found that most existing methods operate at a single spatial scale, for a single point in time, and proxy only one socioeconomic metric. It also notes an underutilization of fusion capabilities with disparate datasets.
Traditional survey and census data are not sufficient for measuring poverty and progress towards achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Satellite Earth Observation (EO) is a novel data source that has considerable potential to augment data for sustainable rural development. To realise the full potential of EO data as a proxy for socioeconomic conditions, end-users - both expert and non-expert - must be able to make the right decisions about what data to use and how to use it. In this review, we present an outline of what needs to be done to operationalise, and increase confidence in, EO data for sustainable rural development and monitoring the socioeconomic targets of the SDGs. We find that most approaches developed so far operate at a single spatial scale, for a single point in time, and proxy only one socioeconomic metric. Moreover, research has been geographically focused across three main regions: West Africa, East Africa, and the Indian Subcontinent, which underscores a need to conduct research into the utility of EO for monitoring poverty across more regions, to identify transferable EO proxies and methods. A variety of data from different EO platforms have been integrated into such analyses, with Landsat and MODIS datasets proving to be the most utilised to-date. Meanwhile, there is an apparent underutilisation of fusion capabilities with disparate datasets, in terms of (i) other EO datasets such as RADAR data, and (ii) non-traditional datasets such as geospatial population layers. We identify five key areas requiring further development to encourage operational uptake of EO for proxying socioeconomic conditions and conclude by linking these with the technical and implementational challenges identified across the review to make explicit recommendations. This review contributes towards developing transparent data systems to assemble the high-quality data required to monitor socioeconomic conditions across rural spaces at fine temporal and spatial scales.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据