4.6 Article

A prediction model of the cutting force-induced deformation while considering the removed material impact

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-08291-w

关键词

Machining deformation; Workpiece stiffness; Finite element method; Thin-walled parts

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52005030]
  2. Aeronautical Science Foundation of China [2019160M5002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a deformation prediction model is proposed for the milling process of thin-walled parts, incorporating the super-element method and a novel node re-sorting method to optimize stiffness direction. Simulation and experiments validate the accuracy of the proposed model in minimizing machining deformation.
Due to the unique low rigidity of thin-walled parts, significant machining deformation may occur in the milling process. A deformation prediction model is presented in this paper while considering the effect of the removed material on the global stiffness matrix. Aiming at reducing the scale of the global stiffness matrix, the super-element method is firstly used and the scale of the stiffness matrix is significantly reduced about 30%. And then, the stiffness matrix of the in-process workpiece (IPW) is directly obtained by eliminating the contribution of the removed nodes in the global stiffness matrix. This method can avoid re-building the geometric model or re-meshing the finite element (FE) model in the machining process. To improve the inverse calculation efficiency of the stiffness matrix, a novel nodes re-sorting method is proposed based on the calculation order of the matrix blocks in LU decomposition and inverse calculation. Furthermore, the optimal stiffness direction is discussed and applying the cutting force in this direction can minimize the machining deformation. The simulation results verified the existence of the optimal stiffness direction. Finally, the simulation and experiment are carried out to validate the accuracy of the proposed model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据