4.6 Article

Influence of cusp external magnetic field on deposition rate of two-electrode TIG welding

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-022-08706-2

关键词

T-TIG; Cusp EMF; Deposition rate; Arc shape; Arc energy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52175290]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study conducted experiments to investigate the influence of a magnetic field on the deposition rate of two-electrode tungsten insert gas welding. The results showed that the magnetic field affected the shape of the arc but did not significantly impact the arc pressure, electron temperature, and electron density. However, the magnetic field resulted in a better distribution of energy along a specific axis, improving the preheating and melting of the filler wire and increasing the deposition rate.
Experiments have been conducted to investigate the influence of the cusp external magnetic field (EMF) on deposition rate of two-electrode tungsten insert gas (T-TIG) welding. T-TIG arc parameters such as arc shape, arc voltage, arc pressure, and arc plasma information were acquired respectively. Results showed that compared to TIG a higher welding current could be allowed for T-TIG due to its low arc pressure characteristic. Under the effect of the cusp EMF, the arc shape was compressed along the x-axis of T-TIG, while elongated along the y-axis of T-TIG. Besides, the peak arc pressure of T-TIG was not significantly increased by the cusp EMF. Moreover, with the action of the cusp EMF, the maximum values of the electron temperature (T-e) and electron density (N-e) of T-TIG were not significantly increased, but along the y-axis, the increments of the two parameters were gradually increased and their distributions were widened. Therefore, more arc energy was allocated on the y-axis of T-TIG by the cusp EMF, which could improve the preheating and the melting of the filler wire along the y-axis, so the deposition rate of T-TIG could be increased by 17.6% under the effect of the cusp EMF.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据