4.8 Article

Linear Regulator Design Considerations of the Serial Linear-Assisted Switching Converter Used as Envelope Amplifier

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER ELECTRONICS
卷 31, 期 5, 页码 3673-3689

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPEL.2015.2463122

关键词

Circular convolution; envelope amplifier (EA); high-voltage linear regulator; power supply rejection ratio (PSRR) improvement filter; serial linear-assisted switching converters

资金

  1. Shenzhen Science and Technology Plan Project [JCYJ20140417172417127, JSGG20150529114007828]
  2. ITS fund from China Academy of Space Technology

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Envelope elimination and restoration technique and envelope tracking technique are proposed to enhance efficiency of radio frequency power amplifier (RFPA), and both of them take envelope amplifier (EA) as a high slew-rate variable voltage source. Serial linear-assisted switching converter, one of the solutions of EA, has benefits in high tracking bandwidth, high tracking accuracy, and relatively low switching losses. Among those many types of linear-assisted switching converter, the design of a linear regulator is rarely mentioned. This paper proposes a new design of linear regulator to supply a higher voltage and maintain high tracking bandwidth by dividing a linear regulator into four different parts. Beyond that, an input filter is recommended to increase the power supply rejection ratio (PSRR) of a linear regulator in high frequency, which is able to reduce the glitch caused by multilevel voltage power supply. An EA prototype is composed of the proposed linear regulator, the PSRR improvement filter, and the multilevel voltage power supply. To align signals, circular convolution is suggested as a modified algorithm. Experiments show that this prototype has a maximum output of 40 V, a tracking bandwidth of about 2 MHz for a full-range sinusoidal signal, and a tracking ability for OFDM envelope signal with a subcarrier up to 5 MHz.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据