4.2 Article

Implication of Ivabradine Therapy in Up-Titrating Beta-Blocker Dose in Patients with Systolic Dysfunction

期刊

INTERNATIONAL HEART JOURNAL
卷 62, 期 6, 页码 1305-1309

出版社

INT HEART JOURNAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1536/ihj.21-387

关键词

Heart failure; Cardiomyopathy; Echocardiography

资金

  1. Ono Pharmaceutical
  2. Inamori Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aims to investigate the role of ivabradine in up-titrating betablockers to improve clinical outcomes in patients with systolic dysfunction. The results will provide valuable information for gradually increasing the dose of beta-blockers in clinical practice.
Ivabradine, which reduces heart rate (HR) without affecting sympathetic nerve activity, improves mortality and morbidity in patients with systolic dysfunction. However, its impact on up-titrating a concomitant betablocker dose in such a cohort, via increasing cardiac output and blood pressure and improving tolerability to beta-blockers, remains unknown. In this single-center, prospective, randomized control trial, patients with systolic dysfunction, defined as left ventricular ejection fraction < 50%, sinus rhythm, heart rate > 75 bpm, systolic blood pressure between 90 and 110 mmHg, and New York Heart Association functional class III or IV, who are refractory to up-titration of a beta-blocker due to symptomatic hypotension, dizziness, or worsening heart failure, were assigned to the 20 ivabradine arm or the 20 conventional therapy arm and followed-up for 6 months. The primary outcome is the daily dose of beta-blocker at 6-months follow-up. The secondary outcomes are echocardiographic parameters including overlap between E-wave and A-wave in transmitral diastolic filling flow, plasma B-type natriuretic peptide level, 6-minute walk distance, and heart failure readmission rate. By conducting this study, we hope to demonstrate the clinical benefit of ivabradine therapy in up-titrating betablockers and improving clinical outcomes in patients with systolic dysfunction. (Int Heart J 2021; 62: 1305-1309)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据