4.4 Article

Determination of bacterial community structure of Turkish kefir beverages via metagenomic approach

期刊

INTERNATIONAL DAIRY JOURNAL
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2022.105337

关键词

-

资金

  1. BioProject [PRJNA764873]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The bacterial microbiota of industrially produced kefir beverages consumed in Turkey was analyzed using a culture-independent and metagenomic approach. The dominant phyla were Firmicutes, followed by Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria. Lactococcus was the most abundant genus in non pre-enriched kefirs, while Streptococcus was dominant in pre-enriched kefirs. Several genera were only found in pre-enriched kefirs. The study suggests potential applications of kefir beverages in industrial and medical fields.
Bacterial microbiota of industrially produced kefir beverages (n:33) consumed in Turkey was studied using a culture-independent method and a metagenomic approach. DNA extraction from non pre enriched and pre-enriched kefir samples was used for 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing. Kefirs were dominated by Firmicutes, followed by Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria phyla. The most abundant genera in non pre-enriched kefir beverages were Lactococcus followed by Streptococcus, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, and Leuconostoc. Pre-enriched kefirs were dominated by Streptococcus followed by Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Bifidobacterium, and Leuconostoc at the genus level. Psychroserpens, Desulfonispora, Pediococcus, Micromonospora, Fructobacillus, Mycobacterium, Acetobacter, Pseudopedobacter, and Clostridium XI genera were found only in pre-enriched kefirs. Kefirs displayed pH differences from 4.04 to 4.49 and the acidity was 0.617e0.987. In two samples, the lowest pH values were obtained with abundance of Lactobacillus helveticus and Streptococcus salivarius. This study broadens our viewpoint and strengthens future applications of kefir beverages in industrial and medical fields. (C)& nbsp;2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据