4.7 Article

Rectangular heat sink filled with PCM/ hybrid nanoparticles composites and cooled by intruded T-shaped cavity: Numerical investigation of thermal performance

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2021.105527

关键词

Inclination; PCM heat sink; Lattice Boltzmann method; Hybrid nanoparticles; Price; T-shaped cavity

资金

  1. Iran's National Elites Foundation (INEF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study evaluates the impact of using water-based hybrid nanofluids on a thermal energy storage system. The results indicate that the silica-MWCNT NPs/water composite is the best configuration for achieving the shortest melting time and higher thermal storage capacity.
The thermal storage efficiency of the ice within a rectangular system, which is charged from three sides and is cooled by an intruded T-shaped cavity, is low. It is due to the low thermal conductivity of the ice. The use of metallic nanoparticles inside ice to boost the thermal diffusion is limited due to the stability and chemical reaction. To remove this shortcoming, water-based hybrid nanofluids (NFs), which possess a lower thermal conductivity with inertness, have been used. In this study, the influences of the inclination angle and hybrid nanopowders, Ag 25 nm-MgO 40 nm (50:50 weight proportion), Al2O3-Cu 17 nm (90:10) and SiO2-MWCNT 10 nm (50:50) with the volumetric concentration <= 0.02 on the evolution of the convection-controlled melting in this novel thermal energy storage unit have been evaluated. An iterative explicit enthalpy-based double distribution function-lattice Boltzmann model within the single-phase framework has been applied where there is the thermal equilibrium condition between solid NPs and the base PCM. It is revealed that silica-MWCNT NPs/water composite with a volume fraction of 0.01 inside the case (I) is the best configuration to obtain the least melting time with a higher thermal storage capacity despite the high price of NPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据