4.7 Article

Research on suitable strength, elastic modulus and abrasion resistance of Ti-Zr-Nb medium entropy alloys (MEAs) for implant adaptation

期刊

INTERMETALLICS
卷 140, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.intermet.2021.107401

关键词

Medium entropy alloys; Biocompatible materials; Yield strength; Elastic modulus; Abrasion behavior

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51365029, 51664041, 12162023]
  2. Key R&D Program of Gansu Province-International Cooperation Project [20YF8WA064]
  3. Department of Education of Gansu Province-Excellent Postgraduate Innovation Star Project [2021CXZX-422]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Five Ti-Zr-Nb MEAs with low elastic modulus, high yield strength, and good ductility were designed and fabricated as potential implant materials. Experimental results show that these alloys have corrosion resistance equivalent to Ti6Al4V and wear loss within an acceptable range.
Attributed to their excellent strength, toughness, hardness, wear resistance and corrosion resistance, some Ti-rich high entropy alloys (HEAs) and medium entropy alloys (MEAs) are develop as one of potential implant materials, however poor ductility at room temperature and high elastic modulus limit their application. To obtain implant materials more suitable for human bone, five Ti-Zr-Nb MEAs (TiZrNb, Ti40Zr40Nb20, Ti45Zr35Nb20, Ti45Zr45Nb10, and Ti50Zr40Nb10) were designed and fabricated. All alloys possessed BCC structure, low elastic modulus (52 +/- 2-73 +/- 3 GPa), and high yield strength (675 +/- 18-830 +/- 21 MPa) with elongation over 11%. The solid solution strengthening model and transition metal bond energy model were used to analyze their yield strength and elastic modulus, and the latter can make up for the limitations of concentration (VEC) in predicting elastic modulus. The abrasion test shows that their corrosion resistance is equivalent to that of Ti6Al4V and wear loss of MEAs ranges from 0.02054 mm(3) to 0.1164 mm(3).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据