4.5 Article

Pb-MOF electrosynthesis based on recycling of lead-acid battery electrodes for hydrogen sulfide colorimetric detection

期刊

INORGANICA CHIMICA ACTA
卷 526, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.ica.2021.120540

关键词

Colorimetry; Lead-acid battery; Chemometrics; Metal-organic frameworks; H2S sensor

资金

  1. CNPq [401541/2016-9, 306132/2017-6, 164652/2017-5]
  2. FACEPE [164652/2017-5, APQ-0549-1.06/17/INCT 2014, IBPG-0197-1.06/19, BFP-0110-1.06/19]
  3. CAPES
  4. FINEP

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a one-pot electrochemical method was developed for recycling lead electrodes to prepare a metal-organic framework, which was used for quantifying hydrogen sulfide with colorimetric techniques showing greater sensitivity.
Spent lead-acid batteries are environment emerging contaminants and very harmful to health. In this work, we developed one-pot electrochemical method of recycling lead electrodes for the preparation of Pb metal-organic framework, using 1,3,5-benzenetricarboxylic acid as organic ligand (Pb(btc)-1). In H2S solution, a color change can be observed on the Pb(btc)-1 surface, which is caused by PbS formation and, therefore, it was studied as a smart compound for H2S quantification. Colorimetric techniques, as diffuse reflectance and digital image (DI) analysis obtained on a smartphone, were used for H2S quantification. The grayscale and RGB color histograms were obtained from the recorded images and treated by partial least squares (PLS) regression method directly on a smartphone, or using the MATLAB (R) software. The colorimetric techniques showed greater sensitivity, resulting in a limit of detection of 0.11 mmol.L-1, which is slightly lower than the DI using MATLAB (R) software (0.21 mmol.L-1). The accuracies of the colorimetric techniques were similar and present feasible values when compared to Horwitz criteria. Thus, the H2S sensor ends the lead-acid battery recycling cycle, giving a colorimetric device by a low energy processing of the lead electrode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据