4.7 Article

Relating Excited States to the Dynamics of Macroscopic Strain in Photoresponsive Crystals

期刊

INORGANIC CHEMISTRY
卷 61, 期 8, 页码 3573-3585

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03607

关键词

-

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Higher Education [AAAA-A21-121011390011-4, 121032500059-4]
  2. New York University Abu Dhabi

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the direct and indirect effects of exposing a photoreactive single crystal to light at wavelengths offset from its absorption maximum. By comparing the dynamics of macroscopic crystal deformation under different wavelength irradiation, it reveals that different excited states are involved in isomerization when irradiated at different tails of the same absorption band.
Exposure of a photoreactive single crystal to light with a wavelength offset from its absorption maximum can have two distinct effects. The first is the direct effect, wherein the excited state generated in individual chemical species is influenced. The second is the indirect effect, which describes the penetration of light into the crystal and hence the spatial propagation and completeness of transformation. We illustrate using the nitro-nitrito isomerization of [Co(NH3)(5)NO2]Cl(NO3) as an example that the direct and indirect effects can be independently determined. This is achieved by comparing the dynamics of macroscopic crystal deformation (bending curvature and crystal elongation) induced by the photochemical reaction when irradiating a crystal at the absorption maximum and at different band edges (above or below the maximum) of the same band. Quantitative description of the macroscopic strain dynamics in comparison with experiments allowed us to suggest that irradiation at different tails of the same absorption band causes isomerization to proceed via different excited states and an additional photochemical reaction (presumably, reverse nitrito-nitro isomerization) can occur on irradiation at the ligand-field band edges.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据