4.7 Article

Pulsed electric field treatment enhances lipid bioaccessibility while preserving oxidative stability in Chlorella vulgaris

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifset.2021.102897

关键词

Microalgae; Pulsed electric field; Bioaccessibility; Lipids; Enzymes

资金

  1. Nestle Research, Lausanne, Switzerland
  2. ETH Zurich Foundation, Switzerland
  3. Scientific Center for Optical and Electron Microscopy (ScopeM), ETH Zurich
  4. Functional Genomics Center Zurich
  5. James Holzwarth, Nestle Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrated that pulsed electric field treatment can enhance lipid bioaccessibility of Chlorella vulgaris while maintaining cell integrity and oxidative stability, requiring incubation post-treatment. Proteome analysis identified four proteins that may be involved in cell wall lytic activity during incubation after PEF. Future research should focus on further understanding the mechanism behind incubation after PEF and the potential effect played by endogenous cell wall-degrading enzymes.
There is growing demand for gentle technologies to improve the lipid bioaccessibility (BA) of Chlorella vulgaris biomass while preserving cell integrity and therefore oxidative stability. Pulsed electric field treatment (PEF, 5 mu s at 20 kV cm(-1), 31.8 kJ kg(sus)(-1)) led to an enhancement in lipid BA from 4-7.8% (untreated) to 18.7-20.9%. To reach such a level of BA, incubation in buffer after the treatment (12 h at 25/37 degrees C, 48 h at 4 degrees C) was required. As hypothesized, PEF preserved cell integrity, as shown by particle size and scanning electron microscopy analyses, as well as oxidative stability of the biomass over 3 months at 40 degrees C. Proteome analysis identified four proteins that may be involved in cell wall lytic activity during incubation after PEF. Future work should focus on further understanding the mechanism behind incubation after PEF and studying the potential effect played by endogenous cell wall-degrading enzymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据