4.7 Article

Classifying vaguely labeled data based on evidential fusion

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 583, 期 -, 页码 159-173

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.11.005

关键词

Classification; Dempster-Shafer theory; Evidence theory; Uncertainty; Evidential fusion; Vague label

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [62172018, 62102008]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2021YFE0205300]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a method based on evidential fusion to classify vaguely labeled data, dividing them into small data groups using a valid label-set cover assignment algorithm and applying evidence theory for classification. Experimental results demonstrate that this method outperforms other methods in performance.
Classification is one of the fundamental supervised learning tasks which learns classifiers from the given training data and related labels. The quality of labels is important in classification tasks. However, in many real-world scenarios, data annotation is often corrupted, especially when the annotation process is done by humans. Vaguely labeled data is one of the common problems caused by limited domain knowledge or partial data observation. In this paper, a novel method is proposed to classify vaguely labeled data based on evidential fusion. Vaguely labeled data are divided into several small data groups by the proposed valid label-set cover assignment algorithm. Evidence theory is applied to vaguely labeled data classification by regarding each base classifier on a small data group as one piece of evidence. This gives the chance of classifying unseen precise labeled data from related vague labels. Note that our approach is not restricted to any specific classifiers. It can be generalized to any off-the-shelf classification methods with probabilistic outputs. Finally, experiments are conducted on both synthetic data and real-world data with different base classifiers. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves superior performance against compared methods. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据