4.7 Article

A novel three-way decision approach under hesitant fuzzy information

期刊

INFORMATION SCIENCES
卷 578, 期 -, 页码 482-506

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2021.07.054

关键词

Three-way decision; Relative loss function; Multi-attribute decision-making; Hesitant fuzzy set

资金

  1. NNSFC [61866011, 61976089]
  2. Graduate Innovative Education Foundation of Hubei Minzu University [MYK2021018]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a novel method to solve multi-attribute decision-making problems under the hesitant fuzzy environment using three-way decision theory. By defining the loss function, establishing the relationship between the loss function and evaluation values, providing an aggregated loss function, and utilizing a conditional probability method, the method effectively addresses actual medical diagnosis problems through comparison with representative methods and experimental evaluations.
The paper explores a novel way to solve the multi-attribute decision-making issues under the hesitant fuzzy environment (HF-MADM) with three-way decision (3WD) theory. Firstly, according to the nature of the relative loss function (RLF), the RLF under the hesitant fuzzy (HF) environment is defined. Then, according to the practical significance of the loss function, this paper establishes the relationship between the loss function and the evaluation value. At the same time, considering that the HF-MADM has multiple attributes and multiple evaluation values, we provide an aggregated loss function via the hesitant fuzzy weight average (HFWA) operator to reflect the overall loss of the alternative. We establish the mixed information table (HF-MADMRLF) based on the overall loss function. Secondly, based on an outranking function and a distance from the positive ideal (PI) solution, this paper defines an estimation on the conditional probability method. Finally, we utilize the presented method to solve actual medical diagnosis of pneumonia (MDP) issue, and prove the validity and applicability of the method through comparison with several representative methods and experimental evaluations. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据