4.4 Article

Discordant results between genotypic and phenotypic assays (Xpert MTB/RIF vs. BACTEC MGIT 960 system) for detection of RIF-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates in a high burden region

期刊

INFECTION GENETICS AND EVOLUTION
卷 96, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.105142

关键词

Xpert MTB; RIF; MGIT; Rifampin; Resistance; Sequencing; Mutation

资金

  1. CONACyT-Problemas Nacionales [2015-01-147]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The research utilized DNA sequencing to analyze drug resistance in clinical isolates of tuberculosis, identifying discrepancies in test results and the presence of silent mutations in some strains. It was found that 13 isolates showed discordant results between different testing methods, with 7 isolates having silent mutations. The study suggests that all rifampin-resistant cases should undergo DNA sequencing for accurate diagnosis.
Clinical isolates with discordant phenotypic and genotypic results were submitted to DNA sequencing to identify which were genuinely resistant to rifampin and determine the frequency of silent and disputed mutations in our region. We present the retrospective analysis of all the culture-proven TB cases tested with the Xpert (R) MTB/RIF assay at the Tuberculosis Clinic and Laboratory of the Tijuana General Hospital, Mexico. Clinical isolates showing a discrepancy between phenotypic and molecular tests were analyzed by DNA sequencing. Thirteen isolates tested as rifampin susceptible on the MGIT system were rifampin-resistant according to Xpert (R) MTB/RIF assay. DNA sequencing showed that seven (53.8%) isolates had a silent (P514P) mutation; three isolates showed different missense (L511P, D516Y, and S531L) mutations. Three isolates showed no mutations. The existence of heteroresistance and silent or disputed mutations warrants that all rifampin-resistance cases diagnosed with the Xpert (R) MTB/RIF should be referred to specialized centers for DNA sequencing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据