4.3 Article Proceedings Paper

Coherent Summation of Emission From Relativistic Cherenkov Sources as a Way of Production of Extremely High-Intensity Microwave Pulses

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PLASMA SCIENCE
卷 44, 期 4, 页码 377-385

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TPS.2016.2517670

关键词

Coherent summation; current edge; microwaves; radiation phase; superradiance of electron bunches

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/K029746/1, EP/D036763/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  2. EPSRC [EP/D036763/1, EP/K029746/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

For relativistic Cherenkov devices, we investigate the process of high-power microwave pulse generation with its phase correlating to the sharp edge of an e-beam current pulse. Our theoretical consideration is referred to quasi-stationary and superradiative (SR) generation regimes when spontaneous emission of the e-beam edge serves as the seed for the development of further coherent oscillations. Phase correlation of the excited microwave pulses with the characteristics of the current pulse front and/ or an initial external electromagnetic pulse has been additionally confirmed by particle-in-cell simulations. Pulse-to-pulse stability of the radiation phase within several percents of the oscillation period makes it possible to arrange multichannel schemes producing mutually coherent microwave pulses. In the experiments that have been carried out, the cathodes of independent generators were powered by identical accelerating pulses from strictly synchronized voltage modulators, or by splitting the pulse from a single powerful modulator. For the 2-ns regime with the power of each Ka-band backward-wave oscillator about 100 MW, we demonstrate quadratic growth of the power density in the interference maximum of the directional diagram. In a short pulse SR regime, with the peak power of 600 MW in a single channel, for a four-channel 2-D array, we attained a 16-fold radiation intensity gain.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据