4.4 Article

Mechanical complications of central venous catheters in children: A cohort study

期刊

INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
卷 43, 期 11, 页码 1634-1640

出版社

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/ice.2021.493

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study found that mechanical complications of CVCs are common and significant in the pediatric population, with the highest risk seen in non-tunneled lines. The authors suggest that CVC-associated mechanical complications should be routinely reported as a patient safety outcome.
Background: Despite the numerous advantages of central venous catheters (CVCs), they have been associated with a variety of complications. Surveillance for mechanical complications of CVCs is not routine, so the true incidence and impact of this adverse patient outcome remains unclear. Setting and methods: Prospectively collected CVC data on mechanical complications were reviewed from a centralized database for all in-hospital patient days at our tertiary-care hospital from January 2001 to June 2016 in patients aged <19 years. Patient demographics, CVC characteristics, and rates of mechanical complications per 1,000 days of catheter use were described. Results: In total, 8,747 CVCs were placed in 5,743 patients during the study period, which captured 780,448 catheter days. The overall mechanical complication rate was 6.1 per 1,000 catheter days (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9-6.3). The highest complication rates were in nontunneled lines; this was consistent throughout the 15-year study period. Also, 521 CVCs (similar to 6%) were removed due to mechanical complications before therapy termination. Catheters with tip location in the superior vena cava or right atrium had the fewest complications. Conclusions: Mechanical complications of CVCs are a common and significant event in the pediatric population. We propose that CVC-associated mechanical complications become a routinely reported patient safety outcome.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据