4.7 Article

Plasticized hydroxypropyl cassava starch blended PBAT for improved clarity blown films: Morphology and properties

期刊

INDUSTRIAL CROPS AND PRODUCTS
卷 176, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.114311

关键词

Packaging; Film; Bioplastic; Modified starch; Thermoplastic starch; Biodegradable

资金

  1. National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) , Thailand

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blending of plasticized hydroxypropyl cassava thermoplastic starch (TPS) with polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT) via blown-film extrusion was studied. Higher DS values were found to increase film clarity and glossy surface, reduce crystallinity, improve hydrophilicity, mechanical properties and compatibility between PBAT and TPS. Modified DS in hydroxypropyl starch efficiently improved clarity, mechanical and barrier properties of bioplastic packaging.
Plasticized hydroxypropyl cassava thermoplastic starch (TPS) with glycerol was blended with polybutylene adipate terephthalate (PBAT) via blown-film extrusion. Effects of PBAT/TPS ratios (60/40 and 50/50) and degrees of substitution (DS) for hydroxypropyl groups in TPS on film properties were investigated. All PBAT/TPS blend films were determined for morphology, thermal stability, thermomechanical, mechanical and barrier properties. Higher DS increased film clarity and glossy surface, improved compatibility between PBAT and TPS, reduced crystallinity and enhanced exposure of hydroxyl groups and hydrogen-bonding of the films. Blending caused phase separation with dispersed starch granules in continuous PBAT matrices, giving high surface roughness. Increased TPS and DS facilitated formation of co-continuous structures and miscibility, improving elongation by approximately 210%. Different DS modified microstructure and hydrophilicity of PBAT/TPS films which consequently reduced water vapor permeability by 34%. Modified DS in hydroxypropyl starch efficiently improved clarity, mechanical and barrier properties of bioplastic packaging.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据