4.6 Article

Modeling the Formation of Degradation Compounds during Thermal Degradation of MEA

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 7, 页码 2867-2881

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04496

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCCS Research Centre
  2. Research Council of Norway [257579/E20]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A kinetic model has been developed to predict the thermal degradation of aqueous solutions of monoethanolamine (MEA) in carbon capture. The model takes into account the degradation rate of the amine and the formation rates of selected degradation products, considering the factors of time, temperature, and loading. The model was evaluated using experimental data and found to have an average relative deviation of 17.5%, primarily due to uncertainty in the experimental data. The model successfully predicts the concentration of the thermal degradation product HEIA, but also acknowledges the interaction between oxidative and thermal degradation mechanisms and their influence on the concentration of various degradation products.
A kinetic model has been developed to predict thermal degradation of aqueous solutions of monoethanolamine (MEA) in carbon capture. The model focusses on both the degradation rate of the amine and the formation rates of selected degradation products as a function of time, temperature, and loading. Experimental literature data on thermal degradation of MEA were used to develop, fit, and evaluate the model. The model was found to have an average relative deviation of 17.5%, most of which was caused by uncertainty in experimental data. The degradation model was also compared to a cyclic degradation campaign. The concentration of 1-(2-hydroxyethyl)-2-imidazolidinone (HEIA), one of the more stable thermal degradation products, is well-predicted with the thermal degradation model. However, the results also indicate that oxidative and thermal degradation mechanisms interact and that this interaction influences the concentration of several thermal degradation products.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据