4.6 Article

Study on Selective Preparation of Phenolic Products from Lignin over Ru-Ni Bimetallic Catalysts Supported on Modified HY Zeolite

期刊

INDUSTRIAL & ENGINEERING CHEMISTRY RESEARCH
卷 61, 期 8, 页码 3206-3217

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04594

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1501404]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The catalytic depolymerization of organic solvent lignin was investigated using the prepared catalyst 2.5Ru-10Ni/Al-HY in a high-pressure reactor. The effects of different catalysts, temperature, time, recyclability for catalyst, and solvents on the catalytic performance were explored. The highest yield of phenolic monomers was achieved under the optimal reaction conditions of 5 hours reaction time and 280 degrees C temperature in ethanol solvent.
The catalytic depolymerization of organic solvent lignin with the prepared catalyst 2.5Ru-10Ni/Al-HY was investigated in a high-pressure reactor. Effects of different catalysts, temperature, time, recyclability for catalyst, and solvents on the catalytic performance were explored. The optimal reaction conditions were reaction time 5 h and temperature 280 degrees C in ethanol solvent. As a result, the highest yield of phenolic monomers was 20.2 wt %, the yield of solid residue was only 4.8 wt %, and the gas products were CH4, C2H6, and CO mainly. With the increase of cycle times, the catalyst had no obvious deactivation, indicating a unique cycle stability. Through NMR characterization of lignin and depolymerization products, it was found that the signals of the original structures (A, B, and C) in lignin disappeared after reaction. According to the analysis of the reaction path, the depolymerization of lignin mainly included the depolymerization of lignin into reaction intermediates and the formation of phenolic compounds by breaking chemical bonds. This research showed a method for preparing phenolic products by the molecular sieve catalyzed depolymerization of lignin.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据